Papers › Multiscale machine-learning interatomic potentials for ferromagnetic and liquid iron

Multiscale machine-learning interatomic potentials for ferromagnetic and liquid iron

25 Jan 2022arXiv:2201.10237links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Jesper Byggmästar, Giorgos Nikoulis, Aslak Fellman, Fredric Granberg, Flyura Djurabekova, Kai Nordlund

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We develop and compare four interatomic potentials for iron: a simple machine-learned embedded atom method (EAM) potential, a potential with machine-learned two- and three-body-dependent terms, a potential with machine-learned EAM and three-body terms, and a Gaussian approximation potential with the SOAP descriptor. All potentials are trained to the same diverse database of body-centered cubic and liquid structures computed with density functional theory. The four presented potentials represent different levels of complexity and span three orders of magnitude in computational cost. The first three potentials are tabulated and evaluated efficiently using cubic spline interpolations, while the fourth one is implemented without additional optimization. We compare and discuss the advantages of each implementation, transferability and applicability in terms of the balance between required accuracy versus computational cost.

PaperPDFCode

Code

gitlab.com/acclab/gap-data officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections