Papers › Multiple Imputation Through XGBoost

Multiple Imputation Through XGBoost

3 Jun 2021arXiv:2106.01574links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Yongshi Deng, Thomas Lumley

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The use of multiple imputation (MI) is becoming increasingly popular for addressing missing data. Although some conventional MI approaches have been well studied and have shown empirical validity, they have limitations when processing large datasets with complex data structures. Their imputation performances usually rely on the proper specification of imputation models, which requires expert knowledge of the inherent relations among variables. Moreover, these standard approaches tend to be computationally inefficient for medium and large datasets. In this paper, we propose a scalable MI framework mixgb, which is based on XGBoost, subsampling, and predictive mean matching. Our approach leverages the power of XGBoost, a fast implementation of gradient boosted trees, to automatically capture interactions and non-linear relations while achieving high computational efficiency. In addition, we incorporate subsampling and predictive mean matching to reduce bias and better account for appropriate imputation variability. The proposed framework is implemented in an R package mixgb. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

PaperPDFCode

Code

agnesdeng/mixgb-supplement officialmentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections