Papers › Multi-View Partial (MVP) Point Cloud Challenge 2021 on Completion and Registration:...
Multi-View Partial (MVP) Point Cloud Challenge 2021 on Completion and Registration: Methods and Results
Liang Pan, Tong Wu, Zhongang Cai, Ziwei Liu, Xumin Yu, Yongming Rao, Jiwen Lu, Jie zhou, Mingye Xu, Xiaoyuan Luo, Kexue Fu, Peng Gao, Manning Wang, Yali Wang, Yu Qiao, Junsheng Zhou, Xin Wen, Peng Xiang, Yu-Shen Liu, Zhizhong Han, Yuanjie Yan, Junyi An, Lifa Zhu, Changwei Lin, Dongrui Liu, Xin Li, Francisco Gómez-Fernández, Qinlong Wang, Yang Yang
As real-scanned point clouds are mostly partial due to occlusions and viewpoints, reconstructing complete 3D shapes based on incomplete observations becomes a fundamental problem for computer vision. With a single incomplete point cloud, it becomes the partial point cloud completion problem. Given multiple different observations, 3D reconstruction can be addressed by performing partial-to-partial point cloud registration. Recently, a large-scale Multi-View Partial (MVP) point cloud dataset has been released, which consists of over 100,000 high-quality virtual-scanned partial point clouds. Based on the MVP dataset, this paper reports methods and results in the Multi-View Partial Point Cloud Challenge 2021 on Completion and Registration. In total, 128 participants registered for the competition, and 31 teams made valid submissions. The top-ranked solutions will be analyzed, and then we will discuss future research directions.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2112.12053")
Code
Syntology Ran 5 of 16 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 11 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 14 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran; community (archive-listed): 2 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
16 samples harvested; 5 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 11 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 16 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
6cdff690e29fd5e2 · report
889d52e22e118dee · report
35d6887261f3e988 · report
fd310351a155056f · report
243fb2f0c671bcd0 · report
33f41ccdc70d7e4b · report
147b9dfb59256a12 · report
42dfadaeb0dc9f8f · report
6d4d7045b0ea0735 · report
b21bb89b6edbd8dd · report
4db7368a77694af8 · report
1a05d22d0fffff14 · report
b3efafb434123af6 · report
d50438ea5f0c80b2 · report
0242dce028fb9bc4 · report
7b4853eaa81ec58c · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections