Papers › Multi-level analysis of compiler induced variability and performance tradeoffs
Multi-level analysis of compiler induced variability and performance tradeoffs
Michael Bentley, Ian Briggs, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan, Dong H. Ahn, Ignacio Laguna, Gregory L. Lee, Holger E. Jones
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Successful HPC software applications are long-lived. When ported across machines and their compilers, these applications often produce different numerical results, many of which are unacceptable. Such variability is also a concern while optimizing the code more aggressively to gain performance. Efficient tools that help locate the program units (files and functions) within which most of the variability occurs are badly needed, both to plan for code ports and to root-cause errors due to variability when they happen in the field. In this work, we offer an enhanced version of the open-source testing framework FLiT to serve these roles. Key new features of FLiT include a suite of bisection algorithms that help locate the root causes of variability. Another added feature allows an analysis of the tradeoffs between performance and the degree of variability. Our new contributions also include a collection of case studies. Results on the MFEM finite-element library include variability/performance tradeoffs, and the identification of a (hitherto unknown) abnormal level of result-variability even under mild compiler optimizations. Results from studying the Laghos proxy application include identifying a significantly divergent floating-point result-variability and successful root-causing down to the problematic function over as little as 14 program executions. Finally, in an evaluation of 4,376 controlled injections of floating-point perturbations on the LULESH proxy application, we showed that the FLiT framework has 100 precision and recall in discovering the file and function locations of the injections all within an average of only 15 program executions.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections