Papers › Multi-granularity Correspondence Learning from Long-term Noisy Videos

Multi-granularity Correspondence Learning from Long-term Noisy Videos

30 Jan 2024arXiv:2401.16702archive 2025-07-28

Yijie Lin, Jie Zhang, Zhenyu Huang, Jia Liu, Zujie Wen, Xi Peng

Existing video-language studies mainly focus on learning short video clips, leaving long-term temporal dependencies rarely explored due to over-high computational cost of modeling long videos. To address this issue, one feasible solution is learning the correspondence between video clips and captions, which however inevitably encounters the multi-granularity noisy correspondence (MNC) problem. To be specific, MNC refers to the clip-caption misalignment (coarse-grained) and frame-word misalignment (fine-grained), hindering temporal learning and video understanding. In this paper, we propose NOise Robust Temporal Optimal traNsport (Norton) that addresses MNC in a unified optimal transport (OT) framework. In brief, Norton employs video-paragraph and clip-caption contrastive losses to capture long-term dependencies based on OT. To address coarse-grained misalignment in video-paragraph contrast, Norton filters out the irrelevant clips and captions through an alignable prompt bucket and realigns asynchronous clip-caption pairs based on transport distance. To address the fine-grained misalignment, Norton incorporates a soft-maximum operator to identify crucial words and key frames. Additionally, Norton exploits the potential faulty negative samples in clip-caption contrast by rectifying the alignment target with OT assignment to ensure precise temporal modeling. Extensive experiments on video retrieval, videoQA, and action segmentation verify the effectiveness of our method. Code is available at https://lin-yijie.github.io/projects/Norton.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2401.16702")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 3 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

XLearning-SCU/2024-ICLR-Norton mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran
1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from XLearning-SCU/2024-ICLR-Norton. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Loss XLearning-SCU/2024-ICLR-Norton/mmpt/losses/nce.py community (archive-listed) ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3c604915121f5194 · report
SequenceContrastLoss XLearning-SCU/2024-ICLR-Norton/mmpt/losses/nce.py community (archive-listed) ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · fa8f4f2b0da67ea8 · report
MMContraLoss XLearning-SCU/2024-ICLR-Norton/mmpt/losses/nce.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 14142a69635283c4 · report

Tasks

Action SegmentationLong Video Retrieval (Background Removed)Video RetrievalVideo Understanding

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Action Segmentation COIN Norton Frame accuracy 69.8 #3 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton Cap. Avg. R@1 75.5 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton Cap. Avg. R@10 97.7 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton Cap. Avg. R@5 95.0 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton DTW R@1 88.7 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton DTW R@10 99.5 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton DTW R@5 98.8 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton OTAM R@1 88.9 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton OTAM R@10 99.5 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Long Video Retrieval (Background Removed) YouCook2 Norton OTAM R@5 98.4 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Video Question Answering MSRVTT-MC Norton Accuracy 92.7 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Retrieval MSR-VTT Norton text-to-video R@1 10.7 #35 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Retrieval MSR-VTT Norton text-to-video R@5 24.1 #35 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Retrieval YouCook2 Norton text-to-video R@1 24.2 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Retrieval YouCook2 Norton text-to-video R@10 64.1 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Retrieval YouCook2 Norton text-to-video R@5 51.9 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Focus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections