Papers › Multi-Center Federated Learning: Clients Clustering for Better Personalization

Multi-Center Federated Learning: Clients Clustering for Better Personalization

3 May 2020arXiv:2005.01026archive 2025-07-28

Guodong Long, Ming Xie, Tao Shen, Tianyi Zhou, Xianzhi Wang, Jing Jiang, Chengqi Zhang

Federated learning has received great attention for its capability to train a large-scale model in a decentralized manner without needing to access user data directly. It helps protect the users' private data from centralized collecting. Unlike distributed machine learning, federated learning aims to tackle non-IID data from heterogeneous sources in various real-world applications, such as those on smartphones. Existing federated learning approaches usually adopt a single global model to capture the shared knowledge of all users by aggregating their gradients, regardless of the discrepancy between their data distributions. However, due to the diverse nature of user behaviors, assigning users' gradients to different global models (i.e., centers) can better capture the heterogeneity of data distributions across users. Our paper proposes a novel multi-center aggregation mechanism for federated learning, which learns multiple global models from the non-IID user data and simultaneously derives the optimal matching between users and centers. We formulate the problem as a joint optimization that can be efficiently solved by a stochastic expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. Our experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method outperforms several popular federated learning methods.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from mingxuts/multi-center-fed-learning. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections