Papers › Multi-armed Bandit Learning on a Graph
Multi-armed Bandit Learning on a Graph
Tianpeng Zhang, Kasper Johansson, Na Li
The multi-armed bandit(MAB) problem is a simple yet powerful framework that has been extensively studied in the context of decision-making under uncertainty. In many real-world applications, such as robotic applications, selecting an arm corresponds to a physical action that constrains the choices of the next available arms (actions). Motivated by this, we study an extension of MAB called the graph bandit, where an agent travels over a graph to maximize the reward collected from different nodes. The graph defines the agent's freedom in selecting the next available nodes at each step. We assume the graph structure is fully available, but the reward distributions are unknown. Built upon an offline graph-based planning algorithm and the principle of optimism, we design a learning algorithm, G-UCB, that balances long-term exploration-exploitation using the principle of optimism. We show that our proposed algorithm achieves O(√(|S|Tlog(T))+D|S|logT) learning regret, where |S| is the number of nodes and D is the diameter of the graph, which matches the theoretical lower bound Ω(√(|S|T)) up to logarithmic factors. To our knowledge, this result is among the first tight regret bounds in non-episodic, un-discounted learning problems with known deterministic transitions. Numerical experiments confirm that our algorithm outperforms several benchmarks.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections