Papers › MSTT-199: MRI Dataset for Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumor Segmentation

MSTT-199: MRI Dataset for Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumor Segmentation

4 Sep 2024arXiv:2409.03110archive 2025-07-28

Tahsin Reasat, Stephen Chenard, Akhil Rekulapelli, Nicholas Chadwick, Joanna Shechtel, Katherine van Schaik, David S. Smith, Joshua Lawrenz

Accurate musculoskeletal soft tissue tumor segmentation is vital for assessing tumor size, location, diagnosis, and response to treatment, thereby influencing patient outcomes. However, segmentation of these tumors requires clinical expertise, and an automated segmentation model would save valuable time for both clinician and patient. Training an automatic model requires a large dataset of annotated images. In this work, we describe the collection of an MR imaging dataset of 199 musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors from 199 patients. We trained segmentation models on this dataset and then benchmarked them on a publicly available dataset. Our model achieved the state-of-the-art dice score of 0.79 out of the box without any fine tuning, which shows the diversity and utility of our curated dataset. We analyzed the model predictions and found that its performance suffered on fibrous and vascular tumors due to their diverse anatomical location, size, and intensity heterogeneity. The code and models are available in the following github repository, https://github.com/Reasat/mstt

PaperPDFCode

Code

reasat/mstt officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

DiversitySegmentationTumor Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections