Papers › MoVA: Adapting Mixture of Vision Experts to Multimodal Context

MoVA: Adapting Mixture of Vision Experts to Multimodal Context

19 Apr 2024arXiv:2404.13046archive 2025-07-28

Zhuofan Zong, Bingqi Ma, Dazhong Shen, Guanglu Song, Hao Shao, Dongzhi Jiang, Hongsheng Li, Yu Liu

As the key component in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), the ability of the visual encoder greatly affects MLLM's understanding on diverse image content. Although some large-scale pretrained vision encoders such as vision encoders in CLIP and DINOv2 have brought promising performance, we found that there is still no single vision encoder that can dominate various image content understanding, e.g., the CLIP vision encoder leads to outstanding results on general image understanding but poor performance on document or chart content. To alleviate the bias of CLIP vision encoder, we first delve into the inherent behavior of different pre-trained vision encoders and then propose the MoVA, a powerful and novel MLLM, adaptively routing and fusing task-specific vision experts with a coarse-to-fine mechanism. In the coarse-grained stage, we design a context-aware expert routing strategy to dynamically select the most suitable vision experts according to the user instruction, input image, and expertise of vision experts. This benefits from the powerful model function understanding ability of the large language model (LLM). In the fine-grained stage, we elaborately conduct the mixture-of-vision-expert adapter (MoV-Adapter) to extract and fuse task-specific knowledge from various experts. This coarse-to-fine paradigm effectively leverages representations from experts based on multimodal context and model expertise, further enhancing the generalization ability. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Without any bells and whistles, MoVA can achieve significant performance gains over current state-of-the-art methods in a wide range of challenging multimodal benchmarks.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2404.13046")

Code

Syntology Ran 9 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran · fixture could not drive it; 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 8 ran; 3 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

templex98/mova officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
2ran · our draft was wrong
3ran · fixture could not drive it
3ran
2unverified

Licence: 3 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from templex98/mova. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

divide_to_patches templex98/mova/mova/mm_utils.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 7e03b180fa317c9a · report
get_chunk templex98/mova/mova/eval/model_vqa.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 42a46570620cd9fa · report
get_routing_weights templex98/mova/mova/eval/model_vqa.py official repository ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 24bbcdfa6915a07d · report
parse_score TempleX98/MoVA/mova/eval/eval_gpt_review.py official repository ran · violated contract fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 763f6fe20bd52fbb · report
resize_and_pad_image templex98/mova/mova/mm_utils.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 468eedeba67f1b00 · report
select_best_resolution templex98/mova/mova/mm_utils.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3999ff487573f32c · report
split_list templex98/mova/mova/eval/model_vqa.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 076c252c52cbb161 · report
unpad_image templex98/mova/mova/model/arch.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 55c32993da87759b · report
split_to_even_chunks identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · fixture could not drive it licence of this copy not recorded · 10893c4608c08075 · report
get_mm_adapter_state_maybe_zero_3 identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · bb35e3ac741bb2c9 · report
maybe_zero_3 identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 735025744c1ab0cf · report

Tasks

Language ModellingLarge Language Model

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AdapterCLIP

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections