Papers › Most claimed statistical findings in cross-sectional return predictability are likely true
Most claimed statistical findings in cross-sectional return predictability are likely true
Andrew Y. Chen
I develop simple and intuitive bounds for the false discovery rate (FDR) in cross-sectional return predictability publications. The simplest bounds require only summary statistics from previous papers, and show the FDR is at most 25% in eight out of nine previous studies. A more refined bound shows the FDR is at most 9%. These studies include Harvey, Liu, and Zhu (2016), who ``argue that most claimed findings in financial economics are likely false.'' I demonstrate how Harvey et al.'s own estimates imply an FDR of 9%, and that their conclusion stems from misinterpreting ``insignificant factor'' as ``false discovery.''
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections