Papers › MOS-Bench: Benchmarking Generalization Abilities of Subjective Speech Quality Assessment Models
MOS-Bench: Benchmarking Generalization Abilities of Subjective Speech Quality Assessment Models
Wen-Chin Huang, Erica Cooper, Tomoki Toda
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In this paper, we study the task of subjective speech quality assessment (SSQA), which refers to predicting the perceptual quality of speech. Owing to the development of deep neural network models, SSQA has greatly advanced and has been widely applied in scientific papers to evaluate speech generation systems. Nonetheless, the insufficient out-of-domain (OOD) generalization ability of current SSQA models is underexplored and often overlooked by researchers. To study this problem systematically, we present MOS-Bench, a diverse SSQA dataset collection that currently contains 8 training sets and 17 test sets. Through extensive experiments, we first highlight the OOD generalization challenges of existing models. We then evaluate the efficacy of multiple-dataset training, comparing straightforward data pooling against AlignNet, an existing domain-aware method. We demonstrate that pooling multiple training sets provides a simple yet effective solution, and variation in the data is a key factor for robust generalization beyond training data size.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections