Papers › More Efficient Sybil Detection Mechanisms Leveraging Resistance of Users to Attack Requests
More Efficient Sybil Detection Mechanisms Leveraging Resistance of Users to Attack Requests
Ali Safarpoor Dehkordi, Ahad N. Zehmakan
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We investigate the problem of sybil (fake account) detection in social networks from a graph algorithms perspective, where graph structural information is used to classify users as sybil and benign. We introduce the novel notion of user resistance to attack requests (friendship requests from sybil accounts). Building on this notion, we propose a synthetic graph data generation framework that supports various attack strategies. We then study the optimization problem where we are allowed to reveal the resistance of a subset of users with the aim to maximize the number of users which are discovered to be benign and the number of potential attack edges (connections from a sybil to a benign user). Furthermore, we devise efficient algorithms for this problem and investigate their theoretical guarantees. Finally, through a large set of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed algorithms improve detection performance notably when applied as a preprocessing step for different sybil detection algorithms. The code and data used in this work are publicly available on GitHub https://github.com/aSafarpoor/AAMAS2025-Paper/tree/main
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections