Papers › Moodle Usability Assessment Methodology using the Universal Design for Learning perspective
Moodle Usability Assessment Methodology using the Universal Design for Learning perspective
Rosana Montes, Liliana Herrera, Emilio Crisol
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The application of the Universal Design for Learning framework favors the creation of virtual educational environments for all. It requires developing accessible content, having a usable platform, and the use of flexible didactics and evaluations that promote constant student motivation. The present study aims to design a methodology to evaluate the usability of the Moodle platform based on the principles of Universal Design for Learning, recognizing the importance of accessibility, usability and the availability of Assistive Technologies. We developed and applied a methodology to assess the usability level of Moodle platforms, taking into consideration that they integrate Assistive Technologies or are used for MOOC contexts. We provide the results of a use case that assesses two instances for the respective Moodle v.2.x and v.3.x family versions. We employed the framework of mixed design research in order to assess a MOOC-type educational program devised under the principles of Universal Design for Learning. As a result of the assessment of Moodle v.2.x and v.3.x, we conclude that the platforms must improve some key elements (e.g. contrasting colors, incorporation of alternative text and links) in order to comply with international accessibility standards. With respect to usability, we can confirm that the principles and guidelines of Universal Design for Learning are applicable to MOOC-type Virtual Learning Environments, are positively valued by students, and have a positive impact on certification rates.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections