Papers › Models Genesis: Generic Autodidactic Models for 3D Medical Image Analysis

Models Genesis: Generic Autodidactic Models for 3D Medical Image Analysis

19 Aug 2019arXiv:1908.06912archive 2025-07-28

Zongwei Zhou, Vatsal Sodha, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Ruibin Feng, Nima Tajbakhsh, Michael B. Gotway, Jianming Liang

Transfer learning from natural image to medical image has established as one of the most practical paradigms in deep learning for medical image analysis. However, to fit this paradigm, 3D imaging tasks in the most prominent imaging modalities (e.g., CT and MRI) have to be reformulated and solved in 2D, losing rich 3D anatomical information and inevitably compromising the performance. To overcome this limitation, we have built a set of models, called Generic Autodidactic Models, nicknamed Models Genesis, because they are created ex nihilo (with no manual labeling), self-taught (learned by self-supervision), and generic (served as source models for generating application-specific target models). Our extensive experiments demonstrate that our Models Genesis significantly outperform learning from scratch in all five target 3D applications covering both segmentation and classification. More importantly, learning a model from scratch simply in 3D may not necessarily yield performance better than transfer learning from ImageNet in 2D, but our Models Genesis consistently top any 2D approaches including fine-tuning the models pre-trained from ImageNet as well as fine-tuning the 2D versions of our Models Genesis, confirming the importance of 3D anatomical information and significance of our Models Genesis for 3D medical imaging. This performance is attributed to our unified self-supervised learning framework, built on a simple yet powerful observation: the sophisticated yet recurrent anatomy in medical images can serve as strong supervision signals for deep models to learn common anatomical representation automatically via self-supervision. As open science, all pre-trained Models Genesis are available at https://github.com/MrGiovanni/ModelsGenesis.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

MrGiovanni/ModelsGenesis officialmentioned in papertfNOASSERTION report
cswin/AWC mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

AnatomyBrain Tumor SegmentationLiver SegmentationLung Nodule DetectionLung Nodule SegmentationMedical Image AnalysisMedical Image SegmentationPulmonary Embolism DetectionSelf-Supervised LearningTransfer Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Brain Tumor Segmentation BRATS-2013 ModelGenesis Dice Score 0.9258 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Liver Segmentation LiTS2017 ModelGenesis Dice 91.13 #4 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Liver Segmentation LiTS2017 ModelGenesis IoU 79.52 #4 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Lung Nodule Detection LUNA2016 FPRED ModelGenesis AUC 98.2 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Lung Nodule Segmentation LIDC-IDRI ModelGenesis Dice 75.86 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Lung Nodule Segmentation LIDC-IDRI ModelGenesis IoU 77.62 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Medical Image Segmentation Medical Segmentation Decathlon Models Genesis Dice (Average) 76.97 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Medical Image Segmentation Medical Segmentation Decathlon Models Genesis NSD 87.19 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Pulmonary Embolism Detection PE-CAD FPRED ModelGenesis AUC 88.04 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections