Papers › Modeling the Dynamics of PDE Systems with Physics-Constrained Deep Auto-Regressive Networks

Modeling the Dynamics of PDE Systems with Physics-Constrained Deep Auto-Regressive Networks

13 Jun 2019arXiv:1906.05747archive 2025-07-28

Nicholas Geneva, Nicholas Zabaras

In recent years, deep learning has proven to be a viable methodology for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification for a vast number of physical systems. However, in their traditional form, such models can require a large amount of training data. This is of particular importance for various engineering and scientific applications where data may be extremely expensive to obtain. To overcome this shortcoming, physics-constrained deep learning provides a promising methodology as it only utilizes the governing equations. In this work, we propose a novel auto-regressive dense encoder-decoder convolutional neural network to solve and model non-linear dynamical systems without training data at a computational cost that is potentially magnitudes lower than standard numerical solvers. This model includes a Bayesian framework that allows for uncertainty quantification of the predicted quantities of interest at each time-step. We rigorously test this model on several non-linear transient partial differential equation systems including the turbulence of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, multi-shock formation and interaction with 1D Burgers' equation and 2D wave dynamics with coupled Burgers' equations. For each system, the predictive results and uncertainty are presented and discussed together with comparisons to the results obtained from traditional numerical analysis methods.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1906.05747")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 7 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 7 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

7unverified

Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

activation cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn/1D-Burger-SWAG/nn/denseEDcirc.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 631465d7a0bb98e1 · report
last_decoding cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn/1D-Burger-SWAG/nn/denseEDcirc.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 591b07df54845634 · report
test cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn/1D-Burger-SWAG/post/plotARContour.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 6dcfb58126fa9c11 · report
testBayesianMSE cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn/1D-Burger-SWAG/post/plotMSE.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 5af6683c95cd0e12 · report
testMSE cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn/1D-Burger-SWAG/post/plotMSE.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 6a76cbad718c86a4 · report
testSample cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn/1D-Burger-SWAG/post/plotBARContour.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 802b1a3de9da3739 · report
testSample cics-nd/ar-pde-cnn/1D-Burger-SWAG/post/plotBARSamples.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · a01185317f5af3ed · report

Tasks

DecoderUncertainty Quantification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections