Papers › Uncertainty Voting Ensemble for Imbalanced Deep Regression

Uncertainty Voting Ensemble for Imbalanced Deep Regression

24 May 2023arXiv:2305.15178archive 2025-07-28

Yuchang Jiang, Vivien Sainte Fare Garnot, Konrad Schindler, Jan Dirk Wegner

Data imbalance is ubiquitous when applying machine learning to real-world problems, particularly regression problems. If training data are imbalanced, the learning is dominated by the densely covered regions of the target distribution and the learned regressor tends to exhibit poor performance in sparsely covered regions. Beyond standard measures like oversampling or reweighting, there are two main approaches to handling learning from imbalanced data. For regression, recent work leverages the continuity of the distribution, while for classification, the trend has been to use ensemble methods, allowing some members to specialize in predictions for sparser regions. In our method, named UVOTE, we integrate recent advances in probabilistic deep learning with an ensemble approach for imbalanced regression. We replace traditional regression losses with negative log-likelihood, which also predicts sample-wise aleatoric uncertainty. Our experiments show that this loss function handles imbalance better. Additionally, we use the predicted aleatoric uncertainty values to fuse the predictions of different expert models in the ensemble, eliminating the need for a separate aggregation module. We compare our method with existing alternatives on multiple public benchmarks and show that UVOTE consistently outperforms the prior art, while at the same time producing better-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Our code is available at https://github.com/SherryJYC/UVOTE.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from sherryjyc/uvote. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections