Papers › MixPro: Data Augmentation with MaskMix and Progressive Attention Labeling for Vision...
MixPro: Data Augmentation with MaskMix and Progressive Attention Labeling for Vision Transformer
QiHao Zhao, Yangyu Huang, Wei Hu, Fan Zhang, Jun Liu
The recently proposed data augmentation TransMix employs attention labels to help visual transformers (ViT) achieve better robustness and performance. However, TransMix is deficient in two aspects: 1) The image cropping method of TransMix may not be suitable for ViTs. 2) At the early stage of training, the model produces unreliable attention maps. TransMix uses unreliable attention maps to compute mixed attention labels that can affect the model. To address the aforementioned issues, we propose MaskMix and Progressive Attention Labeling (PAL) in image and label space, respectively. In detail, from the perspective of image space, we design MaskMix, which mixes two images based on a patch-like grid mask. In particular, the size of each mask patch is adjustable and is a multiple of the image patch size, which ensures each image patch comes from only one image and contains more global contents. From the perspective of label space, we design PAL, which utilizes a progressive factor to dynamically re-weight the attention weights of the mixed attention label. Finally, we combine MaskMix and Progressive Attention Labeling as our new data augmentation method, named MixPro. The experimental results show that our method can improve various ViT-based models at scales on ImageNet classification (73.8\% top-1 accuracy based on DeiT-T for 300 epochs). After being pre-trained with MixPro on ImageNet, the ViT-based models also demonstrate better transferability to semantic segmentation, object detection, and instance segmentation. Furthermore, compared to TransMix, MixPro also shows stronger robustness on several benchmarks. The code is available at https://github.com/fistyee/MixPro.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2304.12043")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 18 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran · fixture could not drive it; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 18 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
18 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 18 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from fistyee/MixPro. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
144d10b49baeb8a6 · report
03c58083e2ecf6c7 · report
e35a4b2e4114b1a5 · report
08b4e547f3100fc0 · report
4728dc2025227bba · report
b33222a09fc93bec · report
f9fd6241d935f07b · report
eb8623dc7c37757f · report
61bf152e6a42a184 · report
fb32094c6dbece71 · report
9fc4335dd1dc6864 · report
1ecb57de91ce4988 · report
c02cc4e0b5720211 · report
b0a5beb34716d5a6 · report
5dac11fdc41c896b · report
80450600f7f09b0a · report
9b9b6364be5f95f6 · report
1dbef2d4da4ee10f · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Augmentation | ImageNet | DeiT-B (+MixPro) | Accuracy (%) | 82.9 | #1 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Data Augmentation | ImageNet | DeiT-S (+MixPro) | Accuracy (%) | 81.3 | #3 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Data Augmentation | ImageNet | DeiT-T (+MixPro) | Accuracy (%) | 73.8 | #17 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | XCiT-M (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 84.1% | #349 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | CA-Swin-S (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 83.7% | #392 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | DeiT-B (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 82.9% | #484 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | CA-Swin-T (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 82.8% | #494 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | PVT-M (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 82.7% | #507 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | PVT-S (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 81.2% | #655 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | CaiT-XXS (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 80.6% | #692 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | PVT-T (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 76.7% | #901 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | DeiT-T (+MixPro) | Top 1 Accuracy | 73.8% | #983 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections