Papers › Mixed-Initiative Human-Robot Teaming under Suboptimality with Online Bayesian Adaptation

Mixed-Initiative Human-Robot Teaming under Suboptimality with Online Bayesian Adaptation

24 Mar 2024arXiv:2403.16178archive 2025-07-28

Manisha Natarajan, Chunyue Xue, Sanne van Waveren, Karen Feigh, Matthew Gombolay

For effective human-agent teaming, robots and other artificial intelligence (AI) agents must infer their human partner's abilities and behavioral response patterns and adapt accordingly. Most prior works make the unrealistic assumption that one or more teammates can act near-optimally. In real-world collaboration, humans and autonomous agents can be suboptimal, especially when each only has partial domain knowledge. In this work, we develop computational modeling and optimization techniques for enhancing the performance of suboptimal human-agent teams, where the human and the agent have asymmetric capabilities and act suboptimally due to incomplete environmental knowledge. We adopt an online Bayesian approach that enables a robot to infer people's willingness to comply with its assistance in a sequential decision-making game. Our user studies show that user preferences and team performance indeed vary with robot intervention styles, and our approach for mixed-initiative collaborations enhances objective team performance (p<.001) and subjective measures, such as user's trust (p<.001) and perceived likeability of the robot (p<.001).

PaperPDFCode

Code

core-robotics-lab/bayes-pomcp officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Decision MakingSequential Decision Making

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections