Papers › Mitigating Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning with Data Augmentation

Mitigating Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning with Data Augmentation

20 Jun 2022arXiv:2206.09979archive 2025-07-28

Artur Back de Luca, Guojun Zhang, Xi Chen, YaoLiang Yu

Federated Learning (FL) is a prominent framework that enables training a centralized model while securing user privacy by fusing local, decentralized models. In this setting, one major obstacle is data heterogeneity, i.e., each client having non-identically and independently distributed (non-IID) data. This is analogous to the context of Domain Generalization (DG), where each client can be treated as a different domain. However, while many approaches in DG tackle data heterogeneity from the algorithmic perspective, recent evidence suggests that data augmentation can induce equal or greater performance. Motivated by this connection, we present federated versions of popular DG algorithms, and show that by applying appropriate data augmentation, we can mitigate data heterogeneity in the federated setting, and obtain higher accuracy on unseen clients. Equipped with data augmentation, we can achieve state-of-the-art performance using even the most basic Federated Averaging algorithm, with much sparser communication.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

huawei-noah/federated-learning mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Data AugmentationDomain GeneralizationFederated Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections