Papers › Minimum Empirical Divergence for Sub-Gaussian Linear Bandits

Minimum Empirical Divergence for Sub-Gaussian Linear Bandits

31 Oct 2024arXiv:2411.00229archive 2025-07-28

Kapilan Balagopalan, Kwang-Sung Jun

We propose a novel linear bandit algorithm called LinMED (Linear Minimum Empirical Divergence), which is a linear extension of the MED algorithm that was originally designed for multi-armed bandits. LinMED is a randomized algorithm that admits a closed-form computation of the arm sampling probabilities, unlike the popular randomized algorithm called linear Thompson sampling. Such a feature proves useful for off-policy evaluation where the unbiased evaluation requires accurately computing the sampling probability. We prove that LinMED enjoys a near-optimal regret bound of d√(n) up to logarithmic factors where d is the dimension and n is the time horizon. We further show that LinMED enjoys a d²/Δ(log²(n))log(log(n)) problem-dependent regret where Δ is the smallest sub-optimality gap, which is lower than d²/Δlog³(n) of the standard algorithm OFUL (Abbasi-yadkori et al., 2011). Our empirical study shows that LinMED has a competitive performance with the state-of-the-art algorithms.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Multi-Armed BanditsOff-policy evaluationThompson Sampling

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections