Papers › Minimum discrepancy principle strategy for choosing k in k-NN regression

Minimum discrepancy principle strategy for choosing k in k-NN regression

20 Aug 2020arXiv:2008.08718archive 2025-07-28

Yaroslav Averyanov, Alain Celisse

We present a novel data-driven strategy to choose the hyperparameter k in the k-NN regression estimator without using any hold-out data. We treat the problem of choosing the hyperparameter as an iterative procedure (over k) and propose using an easily implemented in practice strategy based on the idea of early stopping and the minimum discrepancy principle. This model selection strategy is proven to be minimax-optimal over some smoothness function classes, for instance, the Lipschitz functions class on a bounded domain. The novel method often improves statistical performance on artificial and real-world data sets in comparison to other model selection strategies, such as the Hold-out method, 5-fold cross-validation, and AIC criterion. The novelty of the strategy comes from reducing the computational time of the model selection procedure while preserving the statistical (minimax) optimality of the resulting estimator. More precisely, given a sample of size n, if one should choose k among { 1, …, n }, and { f¹, …, fⁿ } are the estimators of the regression function, the minimum discrepancy principle requires the calculation of a fraction of the estimators, while this is not the case for the generalized cross-validation, Akaike's AIC criteria, or Lepskii principle.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Model Selectionregression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Early Stopping

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections