Papers › MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematics

MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematics

31 Aug 2021ICLR 2022 4arXiv:2109.00110archive 2025-07-28

Kunhao Zheng, Jesse Michael Han, Stanislas Polu

We present miniF2F, a dataset of formal Olympiad-level mathematics problems statements intended to provide a unified cross-system benchmark for neural theorem proving. The miniF2F benchmark currently targets Metamath, Lean, Isabelle (partially) and HOL Light (partially) and consists of 488 problem statements drawn from the AIME, AMC, and the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), as well as material from high-school and undergraduate mathematics courses. We report baseline results using GPT-f, a neural theorem prover based on GPT-3 and provide an analysis of its performance. We intend for miniF2F to be a community-driven effort and hope that our benchmark will help spur advances in neural theorem proving.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2109.00110")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

openai/minif2f officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
facebookresearch/minif2f mentioned on GitHub report
rah4927/lean-dojo-mew mentioned on GitHubMIT report
yangky11/minif2f-lean4 mentioned on GitHubMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from facebookresearch/minif2f. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

reserved_notation_check facebookresearch/minif2f/lean/scripts/lint_style.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 6cd16db0c1444e10 · report
set_option_check facebookresearch/minif2f/lean/scripts/lint_style.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 26a8582dd6f1cac7 · report
small_alpha_vrachy_check facebookresearch/minif2f/lean/scripts/lint_style.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 9a6fcf24bb8c49fb · report

Tasks

Automated Theorem Proving

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

MiniF2F

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Lean GPT-f ITP Lean #18 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Lean GPT-f Pass@1 24.6 #18 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Lean GPT-f Pass@32 29.2 #18 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Lean GPT-f cumulative 29.2 #18 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Lean tidy ITP Lean #26 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Lean tidy Pass@1 18 #26 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Lean tidy cumulative 18 #26 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Metamath GPT-f ITP Metamath #29 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Metamath GPT-f Pass@1 1.3 #29 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-test Metamath GPT-f cumulative 1.6 #29 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-valid Lean GPT-f Pass@1 23.9 #1 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-valid Lean GPT-f Pass@8 29.3 #1 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-valid Metamath GPT-f Pass@1 1 #2 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-valid Metamath GPT-f Pass@8 2 #2 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Automated Theorem Proving miniF2F-valid Lean tidy Pass@1 16.8 #7 of 10 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

AdamAttentionAttention DropoutBPECosine AnnealingDense ConnectionsDropoutGPT-3Layer NormalizationLinear LayerLinear Warmup With Cosine AnnealingMulti-Head AttentionResidual ConnectionSoftmaxWeight Decay

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections