Papers › Mind the Gap: Detecting Black-box Adversarial Attacks in the Making through Query...
Mind the Gap: Detecting Black-box Adversarial Attacks in the Making through Query Update Analysis
Jeonghwan Park, Niall McLaughlin, Ihsen Alouani
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Adversarial attacks remain a significant threat that can jeopardize the integrity of Machine Learning (ML) models. In particular, query-based black-box attacks can generate malicious noise without having access to the victim model's architecture, making them practical in real-world contexts. The community has proposed several defenses against adversarial attacks, only to be broken by more advanced and adaptive attack strategies. In this paper, we propose a framework that detects if an adversarial noise instance is being generated. Unlike existing stateful defenses that detect adversarial noise generation by monitoring the input space, our approach learns adversarial patterns in the input update similarity space. In fact, we propose to observe a new metric called Delta Similarity (DS), which we show it captures more efficiently the adversarial behavior. We evaluate our approach against 8 state-of-the-art attacks, including adaptive attacks, where the adversary is aware of the defense and tries to evade detection. We find that our approach is significantly more robust than existing defenses both in terms of specificity and sensitivity.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections