Papers › Mind the box: l₁-APGD for sparse adversarial attacks on image classifiers
Mind the box: l₁-APGD for sparse adversarial attacks on image classifiers
Francesco Croce, Matthias Hein
We show that when taking into account also the image domain [0,1]ᵈ, established l₁-projected gradient descent (PGD) attacks are suboptimal as they do not consider that the effective threat model is the intersection of the l₁-ball and [0,1]ᵈ. We study the expected sparsity of the steepest descent step for this effective threat model and show that the exact projection onto this set is computationally feasible and yields better performance. Moreover, we propose an adaptive form of PGD which is highly effective even with a small budget of iterations. Our resulting l₁-APGD is a strong white-box attack showing that prior works overestimated their l₁-robustness. Using l₁-APGD for adversarial training we get a robust classifier with SOTA l₁-robustness. Finally, we combine l₁-APGD and an adaptation of the Square Attack to l₁ into l₁-AutoAttack, an ensemble of attacks which reliably assesses adversarial robustness for the threat model of l₁-ball intersected with [0,1]ᵈ.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2103.01208")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 12 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 7 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 12 samples from 2 repositories, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
dfd8fbbc663ac95e · report
edab3f9c146ad457 · report
7325c49fd8c6a7d2 · report
70c177095b43730b · report
5d25f9fb43f3d226 · report
e8b6ca4f669623e7 · report
929e775a8340f085 · report
0832e3bf9440362b · report
c6344b8a7b36aea8 · report
bbb91aff6f54a002 · report
bcf13be809e95acc · report
dfcb6366ce0d55d8 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections