Papers › MetaSAug: Meta Semantic Augmentation for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition

MetaSAug: Meta Semantic Augmentation for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition

23 Mar 2021CVPR 2021 1arXiv:2103.12579archive 2025-07-28

Shuang Li, Kaixiong Gong, Chi Harold Liu, Yulin Wang, Feng Qiao, Xinjing Cheng

Real-world training data usually exhibits long-tailed distribution, where several majority classes have a significantly larger number of samples than the remaining minority classes. This imbalance degrades the performance of typical supervised learning algorithms designed for balanced training sets. In this paper, we address this issue by augmenting minority classes with a recently proposed implicit semantic data augmentation (ISDA) algorithm, which produces diversified augmented samples by translating deep features along many semantically meaningful directions. Importantly, given that ISDA estimates the class-conditional statistics to obtain semantic directions, we find it ineffective to do this on minority classes due to the insufficient training data. To this end, we propose a novel approach to learn transformed semantic directions with meta-learning automatically. In specific, the augmentation strategy during training is dynamically optimized, aiming to minimize the loss on a small balanced validation set, which is approximated via a meta update step. Extensive empirical results on CIFAR-LT-10/100, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2017/2018 validate the effectiveness of our method.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2103.12579")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

BIT-DA/MetaSAug officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran
1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from BIT-DA/MetaSAug. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

MetaBatchNorm2d BIT-DA/MetaSAug/ImageNet_iNat/resnet_meta.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 885f4cef722f0ecb · report
MetaConv2d BIT-DA/MetaSAug/ImageNet_iNat/resnet_meta.py official repository ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · c5563b3215911fe1 · report
FeatureMeta BIT-DA/MetaSAug/ImageNet_iNat/resnet_meta.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 9656bad1da39d4b0 · report

Tasks

Data AugmentationImage ClassificationLong-tail LearningMeta-Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification iNaturalist MetaSAug Top 1 Accuracy 63.28% #16 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification iNaturalist 2018 MetaSAug Top-1 Accuracy 68.75% #42 of 60 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ρ=10) MetaSAug-LDAM Error Rate 10.32 #25 of 50 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ρ=100) MetaSAug-LDAM Error Rate 19.34 #20 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ρ=200) MetaSAug-LDAM Error Rate 22.65 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ρ=50) MetaSAug-LDAM Error Rate 15.66 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ρ=10) MetaSAug-LDAM Error Rate 38.72 #23 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ρ=100) MetaSAug-LDAM Error Rate 51.99 #35 of 66 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ρ=200) MetaSAug-LDAM Error Rate 56.91 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ρ=50) MetaSAug-LDAM Error Rate 47.73 #21 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning ImageNet-LT MetaSAug (ResNet-152) Top-1 Accuracy 50.03 #55 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning ImageNet-LT MetaSAug with CE loss Top-1 Accuracy 47.39 #56 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Long-tail Learning iNaturalist 2018 MetaSAug Top-1 Accuracy 68.75% #38 of 43 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections