Papers › Meta-Learning with Context-Agnostic Initialisations

Meta-Learning with Context-Agnostic Initialisations

29 Jul 2020arXiv:2007.14658archive 2025-07-28

Toby Perrett, Alessandro Masullo, Tilo Burghardt, Majid Mirmehdi, Dima Damen

Meta-learning approaches have addressed few-shot problems by finding initialisations suited for fine-tuning to target tasks. Often there are additional properties within training data (which we refer to as context), not relevant to the target task, which act as a distractor to meta-learning, particularly when the target task contains examples from a novel context not seen during training. We address this oversight by incorporating a context-adversarial component into the meta-learning process. This produces an initialisation for fine-tuning to target which is both context-agnostic and task-generalised. We evaluate our approach on three commonly used meta-learning algorithms and two problems. We demonstrate our context-agnostic meta-learning improves results in each case. First, we report on Omniglot few-shot character classification, using alphabets as context. An average improvement of 4.3% is observed across methods and tasks when classifying characters from an unseen alphabet. Second, we evaluate on a dataset for personalised energy expenditure predictions from video, using participant knowledge as context. We demonstrate that context-agnostic meta-learning decreases the average mean square error by 30%.

PaperPDFCode

Code

tobyperrett/context_splits officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Meta-Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections