Papers › MEDITRON-70B: Scaling Medical Pretraining for Large Language Models
MEDITRON-70B: Scaling Medical Pretraining for Large Language Models
Zeming Chen, Alejandro Hernández Cano, Angelika Romanou, Antoine Bonnet, Kyle Matoba, Francesco Salvi, Matteo Pagliardini, Simin Fan, Andreas Köpf, Amirkeivan Mohtashami, Alexandre Sallinen, Alireza Sakhaeirad, Vinitra Swamy, Igor Krawczuk, Deniz Bayazit, Axel Marmet, Syrielle Montariol, Mary-Anne Hartley, Martin Jaggi, Antoine Bosselut
Large language models (LLMs) can potentially democratize access to medical knowledge. While many efforts have been made to harness and improve LLMs' medical knowledge and reasoning capacities, the resulting models are either closed-source (e.g., PaLM, GPT-4) or limited in scale (<= 13B parameters), which restricts their abilities. In this work, we improve access to large-scale medical LLMs by releasing MEDITRON: a suite of open-source LLMs with 7B and 70B parameters adapted to the medical domain. MEDITRON builds on Llama-2 (through our adaptation of Nvidia's Megatron-LM distributed trainer), and extends pretraining on a comprehensively curated medical corpus, including selected PubMed articles, abstracts, and internationally-recognized medical guidelines. Evaluations using four major medical benchmarks show significant performance gains over several state-of-the-art baselines before and after task-specific finetuning. Overall, MEDITRON achieves a 6% absolute performance gain over the best public baseline in its parameter class and 3% over the strongest baseline we finetuned from Llama-2. Compared to closed-source LLMs, MEDITRON-70B outperforms GPT-3.5 and Med-PaLM and is within 5% of GPT-4 and 10% of Med-PaLM-2. We release our code for curating the medical pretraining corpus and the MEDITRON model weights to drive open-source development of more capable medical LLMs.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2311.16079")
Code
Syntology Ran 9 of 14 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 9 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 14 samples from 1 repository, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
14 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from epfllm/meditron. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
4452a22b84309806 · report
aeb12ea36b675148 · report
983fd1e0e6e34a3f · report
1ababc7e1e681f41 · report
15943fc5c02ac67e · report
8143fb4298119175 · report
7e8c378eedc74237 · report
ed2919d070e3e6e8 · report
63ecbb0137ec2cf0 · report
df54cf786ee59bad · report
baf77bfa09d1505d · report
42f0d9df1f4e7733 · report
bc10fd06d25d060b · report
6c12a5dfd0746a7c · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Few-Shot Learning | MedConceptsQA | epfl-llm/meditron-70b | Accuracy | 25.262 | #7 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Few-Shot Learning | MedConceptsQA | epfl-llm/meditron-7b | Accuracy | 23.787 | #12 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Multiple Choice Question Answering (MCQA) | MedMCQA | Meditron-70B (CoT + SC) | Dev Set (Acc-%) | 66.0 | #11 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | MedQA | Meditron-70B (CoT + SC) | Accuracy | 70.2 | #9 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | MedQA | LLAMA-2 (70B SC CoT) | Accuracy | 61.5 | #11 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | MedQA | LLAMA-2 (70B) | Accuracy | 59.2 | #14 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | PubMedQA | Meditron-70B (CoT + SC) | Accuracy | 81.6 | #1 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Zero-Shot Learning | MedConceptsQA | epfl-llm/meditron-7b | Accuracy | 25.751 | #5 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Zero-Shot Learning | MedConceptsQA | epfl-llm/meditron-70b | Accuracy | 25.360 | #8 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections