Papers › Medical Imaging Complexity and its Effects on GAN Performance
Medical Imaging Complexity and its Effects on GAN Performance
William Cagas, Chan Ko, Blake Hsiao, Shryuk Grandhi, Rishi Bhattacharya, Kevin Zhu, Michael Lam
The proliferation of machine learning models in diverse clinical applications has led to a growing need for high-fidelity, medical image training data. Such data is often scarce due to cost constraints and privacy concerns. Alleviating this burden, medical image synthesis via generative adversarial networks (GANs) emerged as a powerful method for synthetically generating photo-realistic images based on existing sets of real medical images. However, the exact image set size required to efficiently train such a GAN is unclear. In this work, we experimentally establish benchmarks that measure the relationship between a sample dataset size and the fidelity of the generated images, given the dataset's distribution of image complexities. We analyze statistical metrics based on delentropy, an image complexity measure rooted in Shannon's entropy in information theory. For our pipeline, we conduct experiments with two state-of-the-art GANs, StyleGAN 3 and SPADE-GAN, trained on multiple medical imaging datasets with variable sample sizes. Across both GANs, general performance improved with increasing training set size but suffered with increasing complexity.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its page in Syntology's graph, with its repositories and citations.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections