Papers › Medical Foundation Models are Susceptible to Targeted Misinformation Attacks

Medical Foundation Models are Susceptible to Targeted Misinformation Attacks

29 Sep 2023arXiv:2309.17007archive 2025-07-28

Tianyu Han, Sven Nebelung, Firas Khader, Tianci Wang, Gustav Mueller-Franzes, Christiane Kuhl, Sebastian Försch, Jens Kleesiek, Christoph Haarburger, Keno K. Bressem, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Daniel Truhn

Large language models (LLMs) have broad medical knowledge and can reason about medical information across many domains, holding promising potential for diverse medical applications in the near future. In this study, we demonstrate a concerning vulnerability of LLMs in medicine. Through targeted manipulation of just 1.1% of the model's weights, we can deliberately inject an incorrect biomedical fact. The erroneous information is then propagated in the model's output, whilst its performance on other biomedical tasks remains intact. We validate our findings in a set of 1,038 incorrect biomedical facts. This peculiar susceptibility raises serious security and trustworthiness concerns for the application of LLMs in healthcare settings. It accentuates the need for robust protective measures, thorough verification mechanisms, and stringent management of access to these models, ensuring their reliable and safe use in medical practice.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

peterhan91/fm_adv officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ManagementMisinformation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections