Papers › Measuring the mass function of isolated stellar remnants with gravitational...
Measuring the mass function of isolated stellar remnants with gravitational microlensing. I. Revisiting the OGLE-III dark lens candidates
P. Mroz, L. Wyrzykowski
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Gravitational microlensing may detect dark stellar remnants - black holes or neutron stars - even if they are isolated. However, it is challenging to estimate masses of isolated dark stellar remnants using solely photometric data for microlensing events. A recent analysis of OGLE-III long-timescale microlensing events exhibiting the annual parallax effects claimed that a number of bright events were due to "mass-gap" objects (with masses intermediate between those of neutron stars and black holes). Here, we present a detailed description of the updated and corrected method that can be used to estimate masses of dark stellar remnants detected in microlensing events given the light curve data and the proper motion of the source. We use this updated method, in combination with new proper motions from Gaia EDR3, to revise masses of dark remnant candidates previously found in the OGLE-III data. We demonstrate that masses of "mass-gap" and black hole events identified in the previous work are overestimated and, hence, these objects are most likely main-sequence stars, white dwarfs, or neutron stars.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections