Papers › Measuring Software Innovation with Open Source Software Development Data
Measuring Software Innovation with Open Source Software Development Data
Eva Maxfield Brown, Cailean Osborne, Peter Cihon, Moritz Böhmecke-Schwafert, Kevin Xu, Mirko Boehm, Knut Blind
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Existing innovation metrics inadequately capture software innovation, creating blind spots for researchers and policymakers seeking to understand and foster technological innovation in an increasingly software-defined economy. This paper introduces a novel measure of software innovation based on open source software (OSS) development activity on GitHub. We examine the dependency growth and release complexity among 350,000 unique releases from 33,000 unique packages across the JavaScript, Python, and Ruby ecosystems over two years post-release. We find that the semantic versioning types of OSS releases exhibit ecosystem-specific and maturity-dependent patterns in predicting one-year dependency growth, with minor releases showing relatively consistent adoption across contexts while major and patch releases vary significantly by ecosystem and package size. In addition, while semantic versioning correlates with the technical complexity of the change-set, complexity itself shows minimal correlation with downstream adoption, suggesting that versioning signals rather than technical change drive dependency growth. Overall, while semantic versioning release information can be used as a unit of innovation in OSS development complementary to common sources for innovation metrics (e.g. scientific publications, patents, and standards), this measure should be weighted by ecosystem culture, package maturity, and release type to accurately capture innovation dynamics. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of this novel measure of software innovation as well as future research directions.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections