Papers › Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models by Proxy of Prediction Quality

Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models by Proxy of Prediction Quality

21 Feb 2024arXiv:2402.13954archive 2025-07-28

Rahul Zalkikar, Kanchan Chandra

Innovative transformer-based language models produce contextually-aware token embeddings and have achieved state-of-the-art performance for a variety of natural language tasks, but have been shown to encode unwanted biases for downstream applications. In this paper, we evaluate the social biases encoded by transformers trained with the masked language modeling objective using proposed proxy functions within an iterative masking experiment to measure the quality of transformer models' predictions, and assess the preference of MLMs towards disadvantaged and advantaged groups. We compare bias estimations with those produced by other evaluation methods using benchmark datasets and assess their alignment with human annotated biases. We find relatively high religious and disability biases across considered MLMs and low gender bias in one dataset relative to another. We extend on previous work by evaluating social biases introduced after retraining an MLM under the masked language modeling objective, and find that proposed measures produce more accurate estimations of biases introduced by retraining MLMs than others based on relative preference for biased sentences between models.

PaperPDFCode

Code

zalkikar/mlm-bias officialmentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingMasked Language Modeling

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections