Papers › Measuring Progress in Fine-grained Vision-and-Language Understanding

Measuring Progress in Fine-grained Vision-and-Language Understanding

12 May 2023arXiv:2305.07558archive 2025-07-28

Emanuele Bugliarello, Laurent Sartran, Aishwarya Agrawal, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Aida Nematzadeh

While pretraining on large-scale image-text data from the Web has facilitated rapid progress on many vision-and-language (V&L) tasks, recent work has demonstrated that pretrained models lack "fine-grained" understanding, such as the ability to recognise relationships, verbs, and numbers in images. This has resulted in an increased interest in the community to either develop new benchmarks or models for such capabilities. To better understand and quantify progress in this direction, we investigate four competitive V&L models on four fine-grained benchmarks. Through our analysis, we find that X-VLM (Zeng et al., 2022) consistently outperforms other baselines, and that modelling innovations can impact performance more than scaling Web data, which even degrades performance sometimes. Through a deeper investigation of X-VLM, we highlight the importance of both novel losses and rich data sources for learning fine-grained skills. Finally, we inspect training dynamics, and discover that for some tasks, performance peaks early in training or significantly fluctuates, never converging.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2305.07558")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

e-bug/fine-grained-evals officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
e-bug/weak-relation-vlm mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2unverified

Licence: 1 of the 4 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from e-bug/fine-grained-evals. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

pre_caption e-bug/fine-grained-evals/models/ALBEF/predict.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 01b53990698e354e · report
getAttMap e-bug/fine-grained-evals/models/ALBEF/predict.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 20f71cac4c4e5bbb · report
itm_eval e-bug/fine-grained-evals/models/ALBEF/Retrieval.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 28a5f825fad88b15 · report
build_mlp identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · 51e7514fd736cca3 · report

Tasks

Visual Reasoning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Visual Reasoning Winoground X-VLM 16M Group Score 21.2 #14 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground X-VLM 16M Image Score 24.5 #14 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground X-VLM 16M Text Score 46.7 #14 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground X-VLM 4M Group Score 21.5 #21 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground X-VLM 4M Image Score 26.7 #21 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground X-VLM 4M Text Score 44.0 #21 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 14M Group Score 14.5 #47 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 14M Image Score 18.5 #47 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 14M Text Score 36.5 #47 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 129M Group Score 11.7 #51 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 129M Image Score 15.0 #51 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 129M Text Score 35.5 #51 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 129M (CapFilt/L) Group Score 12.2 #54 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 129M (CapFilt/L) Image Score 15.2 #54 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP 129M (CapFilt/L) Text Score 34.7 #54 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP-ViT/L 129M Group Score 12.2 #55 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP-ViT/L 129M Image Score 14.5 #55 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP-ViT/L 129M Text Score 34.7 #55 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground PEVL 14M Group Score 12.2 #57 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground PEVL 14M Image Score 15.7 #57 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground PEVL 14M Text Score 33.2 #57 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground ALBEF 14M Group Score 12.7 #58 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground ALBEF 14M Image Score 16.2 #58 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground ALBEF 14M Text Score 32.5 #58 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground ALBEF 4M Group Score 11.0 #74 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground ALBEF 4M Image Score 15.5 #74 of 114 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Reasoning Winoground ALBEF 4M Text Score 29.2 #74 of 114 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections