Papers › McFACTS II: Mass Ratio--Effective Spin Relationship of Black Hole Mergers in the AGN Channel

McFACTS II: Mass Ratio--Effective Spin Relationship of Black Hole Mergers in the AGN Channel

15 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.10590links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Harrison E. Cook, Barry McKernan, K. E. Saavik Ford, Vera Delfavero, Kaila Nathaniel, Jake Postiglione, Shawn Ray, Emily J. McPike, Richard O'Shaughnessy

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We use the Monte Carlo For AGN (active galactic nucleus) Channel Testing and Simulation (McFACTS, https://www.github.com/mcfacts/mcfacts) code to study the effect of AGN disk and nuclear star cluster parameters on predicted mass distributions for LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) compact binaries forming in AGN disks. The assumptions we vary include the black hole (BH) initial mass function, disk model, disk size, disk lifetime, and the prograde-to-retrograde fraction of newly formed black hole binaries. Broadly we find that dense, moderately short-lived AGN disks are preferred for producing a (q,χ_(eff)) anti-correlation like those identified from existing gravitational wave (GW) observations. Additionally, a BH initial mass function (MF ∝M⁻²) is preferred over a more top-heavy MF (M⁻¹). The preferred fraction of prograde-to-retrograde is >90%, to produce results consistent with observations.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mcfacts/mcfacts officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections