Papers › Maximum Coverage in Sublinear Space, Faster
Maximum Coverage in Sublinear Space, Faster
Stephen Jaud, Anthony Wirth, Farhana Choudhury
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Given a collection of m sets from a universe 𝒰, the Maximum Set Coverage problem consists of finding k sets whose union has largest cardinality. This problem is NP-Hard, but the solution can be approximated by a polynomial time algorithm up to a factor 1-1/e. However, this algorithm does not scale well with the input size. In a streaming context, practical high-quality solutions are found, but with space complexity that scales linearly with respect to the size of the universe |𝒰|. However, one randomized streaming algorithm has been shown to produce a 1-1/e-ε approximation of the optimal solution with a space complexity that scales only poly-logarithmically with respect to m and |𝒰|. In order to achieve such a low space complexity, the authors used a technique called subsampling, based on independent-wise hash functions, and F₀-sketching. This article focuses on this sublinear-space algorithm and introduces methods to reduce the time cost of subsampling. Firstly, we give some optimizations that do not alter the space complexity, number of passes and approximation quality of the original algorithm. In particular, we reanalyze the error bounds to show that the original independence factor of Ω(ε⁻² k logm) can be fine-tuned to Ω(k logm). Secondly we show that F₀-sketching can be replaced by a much more simple mechanism. Finally, our experimental results show that even a pairwise-independent hash-function sampler does not produce worse solution than the original algorithm, while running significantly faster by several orders of magnitude.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections