Papers › Materials Transformers Language Models for Generative Materials Design: a benchmark study
Materials Transformers Language Models for Generative Materials Design: a benchmark study
Nihang Fu, Lai Wei, Yuqi Song, Qinyang Li, Rui Xin, Sadman Sadeed Omee, Rongzhi Dong, Edirisuriya M. Dilanga Siriwardane, Jianjun Hu
Pre-trained transformer language models on large unlabeled corpus have produced state-of-the-art results in natural language processing, organic molecule design, and protein sequence generation. However, no such models have been applied to learn the composition patterns of inorganic materials. Here we train a series of seven modern transformer language models (GPT, GPT-2, GPT-Neo, GPT-J, BLMM, BART, and RoBERTa) using the expanded formulas from material deposited in the ICSD, OQMD, and Materials Projects databases. Six different datasets with/out non-charge-neutral or balanced electronegativity samples are used to benchmark the performances and uncover the generation biases of modern transformer models for the generative design of materials compositions. Our extensive experiments showed that the causal language models based materials transformers can generate chemically valid materials compositions with as high as 97.54\% to be charge neutral and 91.40\% to be electronegativity balanced, which has more than 6 times higher enrichment compared to a baseline pseudo-random sampling algorithm. These models also demonstrate high novelty and their potential in new materials discovery has been proved by their capability to recover the leave-out materials. We also find that the properties of the generated samples can be tailored by training the models with selected training sets such as high-bandgap materials. Our experiments also showed that different models each have their own preference in terms of the properties of the generated samples and their running time complexity varies a lot. We have applied our materials transformer models to discover a set of new materials as validated using DFT calculations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections