Papers › Mask Grounding for Referring Image Segmentation
Mask Grounding for Referring Image Segmentation
Yong Xien Chng, Henry Zheng, Yizeng Han, Xuchong Qiu, Gao Huang
Referring Image Segmentation (RIS) is a challenging task that requires an algorithm to segment objects referred by free-form language expressions. Despite significant progress in recent years, most state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods still suffer from considerable language-image modality gap at the pixel and word level. These methods generally 1) rely on sentence-level language features for language-image alignment and 2) lack explicit training supervision for fine-grained visual grounding. Consequently, they exhibit weak object-level correspondence between visual and language features. Without well-grounded features, prior methods struggle to understand complex expressions that require strong reasoning over relationships among multiple objects, especially when dealing with rarely used or ambiguous clauses. To tackle this challenge, we introduce a novel Mask Grounding auxiliary task that significantly improves visual grounding within language features, by explicitly teaching the model to learn fine-grained correspondence between masked textual tokens and their matching visual objects. Mask Grounding can be directly used on prior RIS methods and consistently bring improvements. Furthermore, to holistically address the modality gap, we also design a cross-modal alignment loss and an accompanying alignment module. These additions work synergistically with Mask Grounding. With all these techniques, our comprehensive approach culminates in MagNet (Mask-grounded Network), an architecture that significantly outperforms prior arts on three key benchmarks (RefCOCO, RefCOCO+ and G-Ref), demonstrating our method's effectiveness in addressing current limitations of RIS algorithms. Our code and pre-trained weights will be released.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2312.12198")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 13 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 5 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 13 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
13 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 13 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from yxchng/mask-grounding. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0f786c407fb1ee4c · report
144d10b49baeb8a6 · report
b239247b87d4f3dc · report
a4475703ff58ecf9 · report
dc9ffc0f29e7fa3d · report
22b41155e451683b · report
452475fb6da97402 · report
b3ee64494a3b6d38 · report
a37615738b3ddcd3 · report
61bf152e6a42a184 · report
67fee1d4b5d4493d · report
2944cc78660b63ff · report
fb9398de2966d6de · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Referring Expression Segmentation | RefCOCO testA | MagNet | Overall IoU | 78.24 | #10 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Referring Expression Segmentation | RefCOCO testB | MagNet | Overall IoU | 71.05 | #10 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Referring Expression Segmentation | RefCOCO+ test B | MagNet | Overall IoU | 58.14 | #15 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Referring Expression Segmentation | RefCOCO+ testA | MagNet | Overall IoU | 71.32 | #16 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Referring Expression Segmentation | RefCOCO+ val | MagNet | Overall IoU | 66.16 | #19 of 33 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Referring Expression Segmentation | RefCOCOg-test | MagNet | Overall IoU | 66.03 | #14 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Referring Expression Segmentation | RefCOCOg-val | MagNet | Overall IoU | 65.36 | #16 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Referring Expression Segmentation | RefCoCo val | MagNet | Overall IoU | 75.24 | #18 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections