Papers › MapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem Solving
MapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem Solving
Md. Ashraful Islam, Mohammed Eunus Ali, Md Rizwan Parvez
Code synthesis, which requires a deep understanding of complex natural language problem descriptions, generation of code instructions for complex algorithms and data structures, and the successful execution of comprehensive unit tests, presents a significant challenge. While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive proficiency in natural language processing, their performance in code generation tasks remains limited. In this paper, we introduce a new approach to code generation tasks leveraging multi-agent prompting that uniquely replicates the full cycle of program synthesis as observed in human developers. Our framework, MapCoder, consists of four LLM agents specifically designed to emulate the stages of this cycle: recalling relevant examples, planning, code generation, and debugging. After conducting thorough experiments, with multiple LLM ablations and analyses across eight challenging competitive problem-solving and program synthesis benchmarks, MapCoder showcases remarkable code generation capabilities, achieving new state-of-the-art results (pass@1) on HumanEval (93.9%), MBPP (83.1%), APPS (22.0%), CodeContests (28.5%), and xCodeEval (45.3%). Moreover, our method consistently delivers superior performance across various programming languages and varying problem difficulties. We open-source our framework at https://github.com/Md-Ashraful-Pramanik/MapCoder.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2405.11403")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 10 have no recorded run.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 10 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
10 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 10 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Luoji-zju/Agents4PLC_release. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
de3a0618a914e97e · report
464c0c08fefdf90c · report
fe740cfb7327d8b2 · report
b4ae4f09792713f2 · report
b20bd1bc19f9f7df · report
848bf700245e1978 · report
d76fc1eb310fdfa3 · report
a632c1e691ea6a16 · report
f8a97b7fd226ab76 · report
e00def812098236a · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Competition Pass@1 | 0.00% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Competition Pass@1000 | 8.80% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Competition Pass@5 | 0.00% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Competition Pass@any | 8.80% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Interview Pass@1 | 0.70% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Interview Pass@1000 | 9.27% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Interview Pass@5 | 1.03% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Interview Pass@any | 9.27% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Introductory Pass@1 | 1.30% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Introductory Pass@1000 | 25.00% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Introductory Pass@5 | 3.60% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | APPS | MapCoder APPS-150-cherrypicked (GPT-4) | Introductory Pass@any | 25.00% | #16 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | CodeContests | MapCoder (GPT-4) | Test Set pass@1 | 28.5 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | CodeContests | MapCoder (GPT-4) | Test Set pass@5 | 35.2 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | CodeContests | MapCoder (GPT-4) | Val Set pass@1 | 28.5 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | HumanEval | Mistral 7B | Pass@1 | 93.9 | #6 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | o1-mini + MapCoder (Hamming.ai) | Accuracy | 93.2 | #3 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | MapCoder (GPT-4o) | Accuracy | 89.7 | #9 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | MapCoder (GPT-4) | Accuracy | 83.1 | #17 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections