Papers › Magnetic field sorting of superconducting graphite particles with T_c>400K

Magnetic field sorting of superconducting graphite particles with T_c>400K

23 Oct 2024arXiv:2410.18020links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Manuel Núñez-Regueiro, Thibaut Devillers, Eric Beaugnon, Armand de Marles, Thierry Crozes, Sébastien Pairis, Christopher Swale, Holger Klein, Olivier Leynaud, Abdelali Hadj-Azzem, Frédéric Gay, Didier Dufeu

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

It has been claimed that graphite hosts superconductivity at room temperature, although all efforts to isolate it have been vain. Here we report a separation method that uses magnetic field gradients to sort the superconducting from normal grains out of industrial graphite powders. We have obtained a concentrate of above room temperature superconducting particles. Electrical resistance measurements on agglomerates of sorted grains of three types of graphite show transition temperatures up to T_(cₒₙₛₑₜ) ∼ 700K with zero resistance up to ∼ 500K. Magnetization measurements confirm these values through jumps at \textit{T_c} in the zero field cooled curves, and by the occurrence diamagnetic hysteretic cycles shrinking with temperature. Our results open the door towards the study of above room temperature superconducting ill-stacked graphite phases.

PaperPDFCode

Code

zhaoolee/garss mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections