Papers › MACQ: A Holistic View of Model Acquisition Techniques

MACQ: A Holistic View of Model Acquisition Techniques

14 Jun 2022arXiv:2206.06530archive 2025-07-28

Ethan Callanan, Rebecca De Venezia, Victoria Armstrong, Alison Paredes, Tathagata Chakraborti, Christian Muise

For over three decades, the planning community has explored countless methods for data-driven model acquisition. These range in sophistication (e.g., simple set operations to full-blown reformulations), methodology (e.g., logic-based vs. planing-based), and assumptions (e.g., fully vs. partially observable). With no fewer than 43 publications in the space, it can be overwhelming to understand what approach could or should be applied in a new setting. We present a holistic characterization of the action model acquisition space and further introduce a unifying framework for automated action model acquisition. We have re-implemented some of the landmark approaches in the area, and our characterization of all the techniques offers deep insight into the research opportunities that remain; i.e., those settings where no technique is capable of solving.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its page in Syntology's graph, with its repositories and citations.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

ai-planning/macq officialMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

model

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections