Papers › Deep Learning-Based Estimation and Goodness-of-Fit for Large-Scale Confirmatory Item...
Deep Learning-Based Estimation and Goodness-of-Fit for Large-Scale Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis
Christopher J. Urban, Daniel J. Bauer
We investigate novel parameter estimation and goodness-of-fit (GOF) assessment methods for large-scale confirmatory item factor analysis (IFA) with many respondents, items, and latent factors. For parameter estimation, we extend Urban and Bauer's (2021) deep learning algorithm for exploratory IFA to the confirmatory setting by showing how to handle constraints on loadings and factor correlations. For GOF assessment, we explore simulation-based tests and indices that extend the classifier two-sample test (C2ST), a method that tests whether a deep neural network can distinguish between observed data and synthetic data sampled from a fitted IFA model. Proposed extensions include a test of approximate fit wherein the user specifies what percentage of observed and synthetic data should be distinguishable as well as a relative fit index (RFI) that is similar in spirit to the RFIs used in structural equation modeling. Via simulation studies, we show that: (1) the confirmatory extension of Urban and Bauer's (2021) algorithm obtains comparable estimates to a state-of-the-art estimation procedure in less time; (2) C2ST-based GOF tests control the empirical type I error rate and detect when the latent dimensionality is misspecified; and (3) the sampling distribution of the C2ST-based RFI depends on the sample size.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections