Papers › Low-shot Object Learning with Mutual Exclusivity Bias

Low-shot Object Learning with Mutual Exclusivity Bias

6 Dec 2023NeurIPS 2023 11arXiv:2312.03533archive 2025-07-28

Anh Thai, Ahmad Humayun, Stefan Stojanov, Zixuan Huang, Bikram Boote, James M. Rehg

This paper introduces Low-shot Object Learning with Mutual Exclusivity Bias (LSME), the first computational framing of mutual exclusivity bias, a phenomenon commonly observed in infants during word learning. We provide a novel dataset, comprehensive baselines, and a state-of-the-art method to enable the ML community to tackle this challenging learning task. The goal of LSME is to analyze an RGB image of a scene containing multiple objects and correctly associate a previously-unknown object instance with a provided category label. This association is then used to perform low-shot learning to test category generalization. We provide a data generation pipeline for the LSME problem and conduct a thorough analysis of the factors that contribute to its difficulty. Additionally, we evaluate the performance of multiple baselines, including state-of-the-art foundation models. Finally, we present a baseline approach that outperforms state-of-the-art models in terms of low-shot accuracy.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2312.03533")

Code

Syntology Ran 8 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 8 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 8 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

rehg-lab/lsme officialmentioned in paperpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

8ran
3unverified

Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from rehg-lab/LSME. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

check_rendering rehg-lab/LSME/data_utils/check_rendering.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 6999c939ef18b891 · report
compute_similarity_global rehg-lab/LSME/baselines/models/utils.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 65ace2509cfa0e42 · report
compute_similarity_global_single rehg-lab/LSME/baselines/models/utils.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 67a33aff0eaa9121 · report
get_padded_bbx rehg-lab/LSME/data_utils/data_utils.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 6d63a4a5eb054e60 · report
get_paths rehg-lab/LSME/data_utils/data_utils.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 32f1ebc2d1f583c0 · report
get_pixel_grid rehg-lab/LSME/data_utils/data_utils.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · ca375db15490350b · report
get_statistics rehg-lab/LSME/data_generation/check_rendered_data.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · d5e33b6626b083a9 · report
job rehg-lab/LSME/data_utils/check_rendering.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 4f9430a300acd81e · report
batch_shuffle_ddp rehg-lab/LSME/baselines/nets/moco_func_utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 35c74641cae2d081 · report
batch_unshuffle_ddp rehg-lab/LSME/baselines/nets/moco_func_utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 7573bfb6ba2070ce · report
concat_all_gather rehg-lab/LSME/baselines/nets/moco_func_utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 73cecca9f3575f09 · report

Tasks

Object

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections