Papers › Low-shot learning with large-scale diffusion

Low-shot learning with large-scale diffusion

7 Jun 2017CVPR 2018 6arXiv:1706.02332archive 2025-07-28

Matthijs Douze, Arthur Szlam, Bharath Hariharan, Hervé Jégou

This paper considers the problem of inferring image labels from images when only a few annotated examples are available at training time. This setup is often referred to as low-shot learning, where a standard approach is to re-train the last few layers of a convolutional neural network learned on separate classes for which training examples are abundant. We consider a semi-supervised setting based on a large collection of images to support label propagation. This is possible by leveraging the recent advances on large-scale similarity graph construction. We show that despite its conceptual simplicity, scaling label propagation up to hundred millions of images leads to state of the art accuracy in the low-shot learning regime.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

facebookresearch/low-shot-with-diffusion officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Few-Shot Image Classificationgraph construction

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet-FS (1-shot, novel) LSD (ResNet-50) Top-5 Accuracy (%) 57.7 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet-FS (2-shot, novel) LSD (ResNet-50) Top-5 Accuracy (%) 66.9 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet-FS (5-shot, all) LSD (ResNet-50) Top-5 Accuracy (%) 73.8 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections