Papers › Low-Light Image Enhancement with Normalizing Flow
Low-Light Image Enhancement with Normalizing Flow
YuFei Wang, Renjie Wan, Wenhan Yang, Haoliang Li, Lap-Pui Chau, Alex C. Kot
To enhance low-light images to normally-exposed ones is highly ill-posed, namely that the mapping relationship between them is one-to-many. Previous works based on the pixel-wise reconstruction losses and deterministic processes fail to capture the complex conditional distribution of normally exposed images, which results in improper brightness, residual noise, and artifacts. In this paper, we investigate to model this one-to-many relationship via a proposed normalizing flow model. An invertible network that takes the low-light images/features as the condition and learns to map the distribution of normally exposed images into a Gaussian distribution. In this way, the conditional distribution of the normally exposed images can be well modeled, and the enhancement process, i.e., the other inference direction of the invertible network, is equivalent to being constrained by a loss function that better describes the manifold structure of natural images during the training. The experimental results on the existing benchmark datasets show our method achieves better quantitative and qualitative results, obtaining better-exposed illumination, less noise and artifact, and richer colors.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | LOL | LLFlow | Average PSNR | 25.19 | #17 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | LOL | LLFlow | LPIPS | 0.11 | #17 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | LOL | LLFlow | SSIM | 0.93 | #17 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | LOLv2 | LLFlow | Average PSNR | 26.02 | #11 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | LOLv2 | LLFlow | LPIPS | 0.0995 | #11 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | LOLv2 | LLFlow | SSIM | 0.927 | #11 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | Sony-Total-Dark | LLFlow | Average PSNR | 16.226 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | Sony-Total-Dark | LLFlow | LPIPS | 0.619 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Low-Light Image Enhancement | Sony-Total-Dark | LLFlow | SSIM | 0.367 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections