Papers › Local Planner Bench: Benchmarking for Local Motion Planning

Local Planner Bench: Benchmarking for Local Motion Planning

12 Oct 2022arXiv:2210.06033links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Max Spahn, Chadi Salmi, Javier Alonso-Mora

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Local motion planning is a heavily researched topic in the field of robotics with many promising algorithms being published every year. However, it is difficult and time-consuming to compare different methods in the field. In this paper, we present localPlannerBench, a new benchmarking suite that allows quick and seamless comparison between local motion planning algorithms. The key focus of the project lies in the extensibility of the environment and the simulation cases. Out-of-the-box, localPlannerBench already supports many simulation cases ranging from a simple 2D point mass to full-fledged 3D 7DoF manipulators, and it is straightforward to add your own custom robot using a URDF file. A post-processor is built-in that can be extended with custom metrics and plots. To integrate your own motion planner, simply create a wrapper that derives from the provided base class. Ultimately we aim to improve the reproducibility of local motion planning algorithms and encourage standardized open-source comparison.

PaperPDFCode

Code

tud-amr/fabrics mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections