Papers › Listening to Users' Voice: Automatic Summarization of Helpful App Reviews
Listening to Users' Voice: Automatic Summarization of Helpful App Reviews
Cuiyun Gao, Yaoxian Li, Shuhan Qi, Yang Liu, Xuan Wang, Zibin Zheng, Qing Liao
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
App reviews are crowdsourcing knowledge of user experience with the apps, providing valuable information for app release planning, such as major bugs to fix and important features to add. There exist prior explorations on app review mining for release planning, however, most of the studies strongly rely on pre-defined classes or manually-annotated reviews. Also, the new review characteristic, i.e., the number of users who rated the review as helpful, which can help capture important reviews, has not been considered previously. In the paper, we propose a novel framework, named SOLAR, aiming at accurately summarizing helpful user reviews to developers. The framework mainly contains three modules: The review helpfulness prediction module, topic-sentiment modeling module, and multi-factor ranking module. The review helpfulness prediction module assesses the helpfulness of reviews, i.e., whether the review is useful for developers. The topic-sentiment modeling module groups the topics of the helpful reviews and also predicts the associated sentiment, and the multi-factor ranking module aims at prioritizing semantically representative reviews for each topic as the review summary. Experiments on five popular apps indicate that SOLAR is effective for review summarization and promising for facilitating app release planning.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections