Papers › LINGOLY: A Benchmark of Olympiad-Level Linguistic Reasoning Puzzles in Low-Resource...

LINGOLY: A Benchmark of Olympiad-Level Linguistic Reasoning Puzzles in Low-Resource and Extinct Languages

10 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.06196archive 2025-07-28

Andrew M. Bean, Simi Hellsten, Harry Mayne, Jabez Magomere, Ethan A. Chi, Ryan Chi, Scott A. Hale, Hannah Rose Kirk

In this paper, we present the LingOly benchmark, a novel benchmark for advanced reasoning abilities in large language models. Using challenging Linguistic Olympiad puzzles, we evaluate (i) capabilities for in-context identification and generalisation of linguistic patterns in very low-resource or extinct languages, and (ii) abilities to follow complex task instructions. The LingOly benchmark covers more than 90 mostly low-resource languages, minimising issues of data contamination, and contains 1,133 problems across 6 formats and 5 levels of human difficulty. We assess performance with both direct accuracy and comparison to a no-context baseline to penalise memorisation. Scores from 11 state-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate the benchmark to be challenging, and models perform poorly on the higher difficulty problems. On harder problems, even the top model only achieved 38.7% accuracy, a 24.7% improvement over the no-context baseline. Large closed models typically outperform open models, and in general, the higher resource the language, the better the scores. These results indicate, in absence of memorisation, true multi-step out-of-domain reasoning remains a challenge for current language models.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2406.06196")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

am-bean/lingOly officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
1ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 2 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from am-bean/lingOly. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

listtostr am-bean/lingOly/testing/code/scoring.py official repository ran · violated contract licence not identified · pointer only · 0777d1ff44e7a37b · report
make_batch am-bean/lingOly/testing/code/benchmark_model.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 35d798e826fc7898 · report

Tasks

Logical Reasoning

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

LingOly

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Logical Reasoning LingOly Claude Opus Delta_NoContext 28.8% #1 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Claude Opus Exact Match Accuracy 46.3% #1 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly GPT-4o Delta_NoContext 25.1% #2 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly GPT-4o Exact Match Accuracy 37.6% #2 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Gemini 1.5 Pro Delta_NoContext 23.4% #3 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Gemini 1.5 Pro Exact Match Accuracy 32.1% #3 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly GPT-4 Delta_NoContext 21.5% #4 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly GPT-4 Exact Match Accuracy 33.4% #4 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Command R+ Delta_NoContext 11.6% #5 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Command R+ Exact Match Accuracy 21.5% #5 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly GPT-3.5 Delta_NoContext 11.2% #6 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly GPT-3.5 Exact Match Accuracy 21.2% #6 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Mixtral 8x7B Delta_NoContext 6.4% #7 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Mixtral 8x7B Exact Match Accuracy 14.2% #7 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Llama 3 8B Delta_NoContext 4.9% #8 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Llama 3 8B Exact Match Accuracy 11.4% #8 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Llama 3 70B Delta_NoContext 2.9% #9 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Llama 3 70B Exact Match Accuracy 10.3% #9 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Gemma 7B Delta_NoContext 2.2% #10 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Gemma 7B Exact Match Accuracy 4.9% #10 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Llama 2 70B Delta_NoContext 1.1% #11 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Logical Reasoning LingOly Llama 2 70B Exact Match Accuracy 6.4% #11 of 11 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections