Papers › Light-Weight RetinaNet for Object Detection

Light-Weight RetinaNet for Object Detection

24 May 2019arXiv:1905.10011archive 2025-07-28

Yixing Li, Fengbo Ren

Object detection has gained great progress driven by the development of deep learning. Compared with a widely studied task -- classification, generally speaking, object detection even need one or two orders of magnitude more FLOPs (floating point operations) in processing the inference task. To enable a practical application, it is essential to explore effective runtime and accuracy trade-off scheme. Recently, a growing number of studies are intended for object detection on resource constraint devices, such as YOLOv1, YOLOv2, SSD, MobileNetv2-SSDLite, whose accuracy on COCO test-dev detection results are yield to mAP around 22-25% (mAP-20-tier). On the contrary, very few studies discuss the computation and accuracy trade-off scheme for mAP-30-tier detection networks. In this paper, we illustrate the insights of why RetinaNet gives effective computation and accuracy trade-off for object detection and how to build a light-weight RetinaNet. We propose to only reduce FLOPs in computational intensive layers and keep other layer the same. Compared with most common way -- input image scaling for FLOPs-accuracy trade-off, the proposed solution shows a constantly better FLOPs-mAP trade-off line. Quantitatively, the proposed method result in 0.1% mAP improvement at 1.15x FLOPs reduction and 0.3% mAP improvement at 1.8x FLOPs reduction.

PaperPDFCode

Code

PSCLab-ASU/LW-RetinaNet officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ObjectObject Detectionobject-detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionAverage PoolingBatch NormalizationConvolutionDarknet-19Dense ConnectionsDepthwise ConvolutionDepthwise Separable ConvolutionDropoutFPNFocal LossGlobal Average PoolingInverted Residual BlockMax PoolingNon Maximum SuppressionPointwise ConvolutionRetinaNetSSDSoftmaxYOLOv1YOLOv2

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections