Papers › LiDAM: Semi-Supervised Learning with Localized Domain Adaptation and Iterative Matching
LiDAM: Semi-Supervised Learning with Localized Domain Adaptation and Iterative Matching
Qun Liu, Matthew Shreve, Raja Bala
Although data is abundant, data labeling is expensive. Semi-supervised learning methods combine a few labeled samples with a large corpus of unlabeled data to effectively train models. This paper introduces our proposed method LiDAM, a semi-supervised learning approach rooted in both domain adaptation and self-paced learning. LiDAM first performs localized domain shifts to extract better domain-invariant features for the model that results in more accurate clusters and pseudo-labels. These pseudo-labels are then aligned with real class labels in a self-paced fashion using a novel iterative matching technique that is based on majority consistency over high-confidence predictions. Simultaneously, a final classifier is trained to predict ground-truth labels until convergence. LiDAM achieves state-of-the-art performance on the CIFAR-100 dataset, outperforming FixMatch (73.50% vs. 71.82%) when using 2500 labels.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 1000 Labels | LiDAM | Accuracy | 89.04 | #4 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 250 Labels | LiDAM | Percentage error | 19.17 | #23 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels | LiDAM | Percentage error | 7.48 | #36 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 2500 Labels | LiDAM | Percentage error | 26.50 | #11 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 5000 Labels | LiDAM | Accuracy (%) | 75.14 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 5000Labels | LiDAM | Percentage correct | 75.14 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | cifar-100, 10000 Labels | LiDAM | Percentage error | 23.22 | #20 of 29 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections