Papers › LEX-GNN: Label-Exploring Graph Neural Network for Accurate Fraud Detection
LEX-GNN: Label-Exploring Graph Neural Network for Accurate Fraud Detection
Woochang Hyun, Insoo Lee, Bongwon Suh
Graph-based fraud detection faces significant challenges, such as severe class imbalance, inconsistent connections due to the scarcity of fraudulent nodes, and the camouflage of these nodes appearing like benign nodes. Existing studies often adopt the approach of filtering similar nodes to strengthen the homophily assumption of graph neural networks. However, to effectively address these issues, it is important to distinguish and adaptively utilize the labels of neighboring nodes. In this study, we propose the Label-Exploring Graph Neural Network (LEX-GNN), designed to enhance fraud detection by actively leveraging labeled node information. The core idea is that the manner of message passing and reception should vary depending on the node types. Specifically, we first predict the labels of nodes based on their original or previous representations. Subsequently, each node transmits differently processed messages according to its probability of being fraudulent. Finally, target nodes also receive the messages differently depending on their pre-predicted probability. Extensive experimental results on real-world benchmarks demonstrate that LEX-GNN outperforms existing state-of-the-art baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/wdhyun/LEX-GNN.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fraud Detection | Amazon-Fraud | LEX-GNN | AUC-ROC | 97.91 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fraud Detection | Amazon-Fraud | LEX-GNN | Averaged Precision | 92.18 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fraud Detection | Amazon-Fraud | LEX-GNN | F1 Macro | 93.48 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fraud Detection | Amazon-Fraud | LEX-GNN | G-mean | 92.03 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fraud Detection | Yelp-Fraud | LEX-GNN | AUC-ROC | 96.40 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fraud Detection | Yelp-Fraud | LEX-GNN | Averaged Precision | 83.56 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fraud Detection | Yelp-Fraud | LEX-GNN | F1 Macro | 86.35 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fraud Detection | Yelp-Fraud | LEX-GNN | G-mean | 84.91 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Amazon-Fraud | LEX-GNN | AUC-ROC | 97.91 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Yelp-Fraud | LEX-GNN | AUC-ROC | 96.40 | #1 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections